Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 19:18

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What do you think of Tesla's Model Y coming in ninth among electric cars sales in Europe?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Is red light therapy scientifically proven?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Two Ocean Bands Are Warming Faster Than Ever — What This Means for Our Climate - The Daily Galaxy
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Apple has already fixed iOS 26's biggest design crime - Creative Bloq
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What are the most important skills a fine artist should develop in today's art world?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: